PCL Insider: News from the Capitol

SOUND ADVICE: OFFICIAL ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED BUDGET RECOMMENDS AVOIDING CUTS TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS, MAKING POLLUTERS PAY

On Wednesday, the non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) released its analysis of the Governor's proposed state budget for FY 2008-2009 and took the unprecedented step of outlining proposals to help close the nearly $8 billion budget gap remaining after the mid-year cuts the Legislature passed last week.

The Governor's budget proposal for FY 08-09 would slash funding for natural resources and environmental protection programs by 22 percent below estimated expenditures for the current fiscal year, investing $2.1 billion less than it does today. The impacts would be felt across California; for example, Californians would see the closure of 48 state parks and the loss of personnel from the Department of Fish and Game and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

The LAO budget proposal for Resources and Environmental Protection avoids some of these budget cuts while ensuring that Californians continue to benefit from essential resource and environmental protection programs, departments, and services. It recommends increasing fees on polluters and beneficiaries of environmental services including fire protection in wildland areas, flood management, water quality management and water rights regulation, timber harvest plan review and enforcement, and state parks. These specific LAO budget proposals would raise $345 million dollars to wean these programs off unstable General Fund sources and avoid the closure of 48 state parks.

The LAO proposal also calls on the Governor to find a stable and lasting source of funding in the budget to implement AB 32, The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.


SO GOOD TO MEET YOU: PCL-SPONSORED LEGISLATION MEETS BILL INTRODUCTION DEADLINE

Today marks the deadline for all new bills to be formally introduced in the state Legislature.

PCL is proud to sponsor three new bills this year that tackle a range of important environmental concerns:

SB 1165 (Kuehl) would make three common sense amendments to our state's premier environmental law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
    1) Requiring better transparency when developers or their consultants draft Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) or submit extensive comments on an environmental review document before it is released to the public;
    2) Requiring EIRs older than five years to be re-circulated for public comment before a project can be approved; and,
    3) Ensuring that CEQA judges hear CEQA cases, whenever feasible.

AB 2222 (Caballero) would advance protection of California's groundwater aquifers by expanding the scope of the state's Groundwater Task Force to provide necessary information and policy recommendations to the Legislature.  Specifically, the bill asks the Groundwater Task Force to identify methods to clean up high priority groundwater basins and identify communities throughout the state that rely on contaminated groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. The Task Force will also outline funding sources for existing and future state and local groundwater programs and recommend ways to enhance public access to current groundwater quality information and increase regional awareness of groundwater conditions.

AB 2153 (Krekorian), the Water Efficiency Security Act, would ensure water reliability and security by establishing water efficiency targets for new development and developing a funding stream to increase efficiencies in existing housing. This bill would establish new water efficiency programs modeled on California's successful energy efficiency programs.


MOVE OVER LEGISLATURE; DWR HAS THE ANSWER: STATE AGENCY PROPOSES TO BUILD PERIPHERAL CANAL BY 2015

While countless hours are being spent in the Governor's Delta Vision process and in water bond negotiations to determine how to restore the Bay-Delta Estuary, the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) has apparently decided to bypass the Delta altogether.

According to a recent budget change proposal submitted to the state Legislature, DWR intends to start preparing to build a new "Alternative Delta Conveyance" facility, which would divert water directly from the Sacramento River before it enters the Delta, sending it directly to the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California. Despite the looming budget deficit, the proposal specifically asks for authorization to hire eight new staff that would be responsible for everything from completing Environmental Impact Reports to negotiating land purchases, and constructing the new facility.

Under its proposal, DWR would revive studies and update construction plans that it abandoned in 1982 after voters overwhelmingly rejected its "Peripheral Canal" proposal in a statewide referendum due to fears that such a facility would result in more Northern California water exported to the ever-growing south state, and that the Delta would be left as a saltwater lake rather than a true estuary.

DWR estimates that the canal, or some new version of the old idea, could be constructed by mid 2015.

The budget request from DWR follows a recent letter sent to Assemblywoman Wolk (D-Davis) by DWR Director Lester Snow, stating that according to DWR's analysis, DWR has the authority to build a peripheral canal without legislative or voter approval. The Legislature has not yet indicated whether they concur with DWR's assessment. However, if the budget change proposal is approved, we can be sure DWR will move forward as quickly as possible.

PCL and others have been deeply engaged in efforts to develop and implement a sustainable Delta solution. Given that those processes are producing real results–but have not yet settled on long-term infrastructure plans for the Delta–DWR's proposal seems particularly premature.

We'll keep you updated as we learn more about DWR's intentions!

 


If the text of your PCL Insider does not display correctly (some readers have reported problems with the text not "wrapping" within the message window), please try accessing the current newsletter from our website: http://action.nwf.org/pcl/all-msgs.html.   


 

 
Copyright © 2006 THE PLANNING AND CONSERVATION LEAGUE. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy