PCL Insider: News from the Capitol
HOW YA’LL BEEN DOING? LEGISLATURE CONDUCTS
OVERSIGHT HEARING ON STATE’S GLOBAL WARMING POLICY
IMPLEMENTATION
Monday afternoon, policy committees from both houses of the
California Legislature held a joint hearing on the State’s
progress in implementing AB 32, the California
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006.
AB 32 requires California to reduce annual greenhouse gas
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and includes protections for
disadvantaged communities.
Several state agencies involved in AB 32 implementation
testified at the joint hearing, as well as Jane Williams,
co-chair of the AB 32
Environmental Justice Advisory Committee, Bill Magavern of
Sierra Club California, Devra Wang of NRDC, and Stuart Cohen of
the Transportation and Land Use Coalition.
The results of this hearing may influence the
Legislature’s search for a stable
funding stream for AB 32 implementation amidst the
State’s growing budget crisis.
MADAM SPEAKER!
Congratulations to Assemblymember Karen Bass for her
selection as Assembly Speaker to replace Fabian
Núñez in 2008. Sen.
Mark Ridley-Thomas describes her as “a leader with
whom we can thoroughly entrust our future. She will confidently
and assertively promote policies, programs and perspectives to
benefit the people of the State of California.” PCL is
looking forward to working with the Speaker-elect to build on
the recent successes we’ve had in combating global warming
and poor air quality and addressing state’s pressing water
concerns.
CRASH OF THE CLYDESDALE: FALL RUN CHINOOK JOINS
PLUMMETING SALMON POPULATIONS; WATER AGENCIES CLAIM NO
IMPACT
The Central Valley fall run Chinook salmon, long considered
the healthy "workhorse" of the state's salmon populations,
dropped to drastically low numbers according to recent
counts by fisheries biologists. This fall, scientists
counted only 2,000 “jacks”, which are early
returning salmon that are indicators of the health of the
population. Usually, the jack-count averages 40,000 and
has never dipped lower than 10,000.
California salmon populations have been dramatically
declining since the major dam building era. Yet the Central
Valley fall run has historically been as reliable as Clydesdales
on Superbowl Sunday, consistently returning in high numbers. In
fact, it is the only California salmon run not listed on the
Federal Endangered Species List. 2007 marks the second
consecutive year of drastically low returns of fall run Chinook.
The Pacific Fisheries Management Council, who decides if and
when salmon fishermen will cast their rods and nets this year,
meets
later this month to decide how to respond to the latest bad
news.
The Central Valley fall run Chinook rely on the watersheds
that flow into the Bay Delta Estuary. Unfortunately, the salmon
situation is remarkably similar to the collapse of fish that
live year round in the Delta, now entering its eighth
consecutive year. Scientists have determined that increased
exports from the Northern California and the Delta are a primary
contributor to the decline of those Delta fish. It is too soon
to tell what is causing the low salmon returns, however the
cocktail of declining ocean health and the impacts of climate
change mixed with declining conditions in the Delta and its
watersheds cannot be helping the struggling populations.
Despite the critical condition of the salmon and the
continuing collapse of Delta fish, five
northern California water districts are proposing to export
another 162,000 acre-feet of Sacramento River water through the
Delta pumps. While the Environmental
Impact Reports (EIRs) for these proposed additional water
exports proclaim that these further increases in exports will
not have negative impacts, the struggling salmon may have a
different view. We will not know how the salmon respond to this
additional stressor until we see how many Chinook are able to
make their way through the Delta and into the Sacramento River
this coming fall.
A DOSE OF SENSE: BILLS INTRODUCED TO REFORM
PESTICIDE POLICY FOLLOWING AERIAL SPRAYING FOR LIGHT BROWN APPLE
MOTH
In the fall of 2007, the California Department of Food and
Agriculture (CDFA) began a series of aerial pesticide
applications in Monterey and Santa Cruz counties to control the
spread of the invasive light brown apple moth. Following the
sprayings, more than 600 reports of health problems emerged,
including respiratory difficulties, eye irritation, dizziness,
severe skin rashes and headaches, nausea and intestinal pain.
Residents also reported deaths of birds, aquatic species, and
otherwise healthy pets.
CDFA plans to expand its spraying to the San Francisco Bay
Area this August and continue spraying three times per month
until the moth is eradicated.
Blanket spraying contradicts environmentally responsible pest
management practices, and infringes on California law that
protects the environment and the public’s right to consent
to spraying. Less toxic approaches include using naturally
occurring predators, parasites, and insect diseases as well as
stationary pheromone bait traps, allowing the ecosystem to
respond to the pest, and cleaning up plant debris during
dormancy.
In response to the proposed spraying, Senator Carol Migden
has introduced Senate Committee Resolution 87, which would
request that CDFA impose a moratorium on any aerial spraying
that may be a part of the Department's eradication campaign of
the light brown apple moth until it can demonstrate that the
pheromone compound it intends to use is both safe to humans and
effective at eradicating the light brown apple moth.
Several other bills have been introduced, including: *AB
2760 (Leno), which would require an Environmental Impact Report
when applying for the application of pesticide in an urban area;
*AB 2892 (Swanson), which would require holding an election
to acquire the voters consent before pesticide application;
*AB 2763 (Laird), which would create a planning process on
how to address non-native pest threats and requiring
notification of the Governor, other governmental agencies and
the public; *AB 2764 (Hancock) which would not allow
pesticide application for eradication without a proclaimed state
of emergency; and *AB 2765 (Huffman) would require public
hearings, and a listing of every ingredient in the pesticide
being sprayed.
You can get more information on these bills from the PCL website
If the text of your PCL Insider does not display
correctly (some readers have reported problems with the text not
"wrapping" within the message window), please try accessing the
current newsletter from our website: http://action.nwf.org/pcl/all-msgs.html.
|