PCL Insider: News from the Capitol

 
MEOW OR ROAR? “LUS-CAT” PROPOSALS TO FIGHT GLOBAL WARMING THROUGH LAND USE POLICY TO BE UNVEILED IN STATEWIDE HEARINGS

At a series of public hearings around California this week, representatives of the Governor’s interagency Land Use Subcommittee of the Climate Action Team (LUS-CAT pronounced “Loose-Cat,”) are soliciting public input on their proposals to reduce global warming pollution through land use and transportation policy reform.

Their proposal will be considered by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for inclusion in the AB 32 draft Scoping Plan which identifies strategies to achieve the law’s 2020 greenhouse gas emissions reduction mandate. The draft Scoping Plan is scheduled for release in June 2008.

Although California’s land use planning is in desperate need of reform, we’ve heard rumors that the subcommittee may propose a weak set of voluntary measures to CARB. 

This is a critical opportunity to learn what the State is doing about global warming and land use, and voice your support for better land use and transportation decisions that reduce CO2 emissions, give Californians more choices in where we live and how we get around, and preserve vanishing farmland and natural areas.

LUS-CAT met yesterday in Sacramento. Two more workshops will be held later this week:

Thursday, March 20, 2008
9:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Caltrans District 7 Headquarters 100 S. Main Street
Los Angeles, CA

Friday, March 21, 2008
9:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Elihu Harris State Office Building, 1515 Clay Street
Oakland, CA

For notification of future LUS-CAT activities join the committee’s mailing list or contact PCL’s Global Warming Program Manager Matt Vander Sluis.


BURSTING THE WATER BUBBLE: STATE GETS CLOSER TO DISCLOSING WATER REALITY

Just like the bursting of the housing bubble when the sub prime mortgage reality set in, the 2007 State Water Project Delivery Reliability Report signals a similar burst of California’s water bubble.  The 2007 Draft Report reveals that the State Water Project (SWP) will deliver 20 to 30 percent less water to agricultural, commercial, and residential users than it had estimated in 2005. The draft report is the first to reflect more realistic water export levels, although it still masks the underlying problem that expectations for SWP water are still much higher than nature can accommodate.

The bi-annual reliability report is the product of a settlement agreement between PCL and the Department of Water Resources over our legal challenge to proposed amendments to the State Water Project contracts. This report is the basis of many major water plans across the state, as well as the foundation for water supply assessments required for new development.

In much the same way that irresponsible loan practices fueled unrealistic expectations in the housing market, previous reports, including the 2005 report, inflated predictions of Delta exports by ignoring the mounting problems in the Delta and the impacts of climate change on California’s hydrology.  As a result, water managers, cities, and counties have falsely assumed the SWP can deliver more water than it actually can.

Despite the importance of the report, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure the accuracy of the reports’ projections.  As PCL noted in recent comments, the 2007 report still fails to account for many of the impacts of climate change and continues to overestimate feasible water exports from the Delta.

To address the continuing problem, Assembly Member Eng (Monterey Park) has introduced AB 2970, which would formally require DWR to prepare an accurate Delivery Reliability Report every 2 years and allow for greater public and scientific oversight of this important document.

PCL and its partners are working hard to ensure that AB 2790 is passed and that water reliability tools are fully implemented across the state.


THE SLAMMED SALMON SAGA CONTINUES: NEW REGS WILL KEEP FISHERMEN OUT OF THE WATER; WHAT POLICY ACTIONS WILL KEEP THE FISH IN IT?

Last Friday, in response to the dramatic population declines of salmon in 2007, federal fisheries managers proposed a complete closure of the Pacific coast salmon fishing season. This proposal is one of three potential actions for the National Marine Fisheries Service to consider when it makes a ruling in April to address this crisis.

Full closure would mean a one-year ban on all commercial and sport salmon fishing in California, Oregon, and Washington – a measure never before used in the regulatory history of salmon management on the Pacific Coast. 

A surprisingly broad consensus of stakeholders has rallied behind the closure. However, while the regulations will buy the salmon some time, they fail to address the root causes of the drop in salmon numbers. 

Environmental and fishing advocates are calling for a more comprehensive solution and are advocating for eight additional actions to help save the California salmon.

One action that should take place immediately is ensuring that budget squabbles don’t hamstring the appropriation of restoration funds. Proposition 84 included such funds to respond to a record low year of coastal salmon returns in 2005. SB 562 (Wiggins) seeks to appropriate $5.3 million from Prop 84 to the Department of Fish and Game for salmon and steelhead restoration projects in the DFG’s Fishery Restoration Grant Program. The 2008-2009 State Budget, currently making its way through the Legislature, includes $10.9 million from Proposition 84 funds for Anadromous Fish Management. However, these investments will be drowned out by the $32 million cut that President Bush has proposed from the federal Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund.  

To find out more, contact PCL’s Water Policy Specialist Charlotte Hodde


WHAT’S MINE IS ORE: PRESS CONFERENCE CALLS FOR POLLUTERS TO CLEAN UP THEIR TOXIC LEGACY

Last Thursday at the State Capitol, the Planning and Conservation League joined with Assemblymember Lois Wolk, Environment California, the Environmental Working Group, and the Sierra Fund, to call upon the U.S. Congress to make significant environmental reforms to the outdated 1872 Mining Act.

Specifically, the group urged Congress to ensure that the reforms of the 136 year old law include a key provision requiring prospectors to pay a royalty for mining activities on public lands.  This would provide desperately needed money to clean up the pollution caused by mining.

Mining is currently the number one source of toxic pollution in the country and is having a devastating effect on California’s natural environment and public health. In particular, as polluted rivers and creeks wind their way down to the Bay Delta, toxics are poisoning fish and fouling the food chain. Currently, one-fourth of all the fish sampled in the Delta have "high" or "very high" levels of mercury in their tissues, including the large striped bass, largemouth bass, catfish, and sturgeon which are popular among anglers in the Delta. These toxins bio-accumulate, traveling up the food chain, where they can harm humans as well.

Billions of dollars are needed to clean up this ongoing environmental disaster. Reforming the 1872 Mining Act offers a unique opportunity to begin to address toxic contamination by developing a steady revenue stream that finally makes the polluters pay for their pollution. To find out more, contact PCL’s Public Heath Program Manager Rene Guerrero.

 


If the text of your PCL Insider does not display correctly (some readers have reported problems with the text not "wrapping" within the message window), please try accessing the current newsletter from our website: http://action.nwf.org/pcl/all-msgs.html.   


 

 
Copyright © 2006 THE PLANNING AND CONSERVATION LEAGUE. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy